Starting in July
The single most common error. Two months is enough to review, not enough to learn. Candidates who start late rush content and never practise under time.
Free guide
A realistic preparation plan for the September exam. Adjust it to your own starting point, but do not compress it into July.
Sit a full timed paper before you study anything. It will be uncomfortable and that is the point, you need a baseline, and you need to feel what 100 minutes for 60 questions is like.
Mark it honestly with the real formula. Note not just what you got wrong, but whether you got it wrong from not knowing, misreading, or running out of time. Those three failures have three different fixes.
Work through your weakest subject with a textbook, not with practice questions. Questions test knowledge; they do not install it. Biology carries the most marks, so gaps there cost the most.
Use the syllabus list as a checklist. Use practice questions at this stage only to check whether a topic has landed, twenty after finishing a chapter, not two hundred at random.
Subject blocks, untimed at first. Read every explanation, including for questions you got right, a lucky guess and a correct answer look identical on the page and are completely different in your head.
Keep a list of every question you got wrong and why. Patterns will appear within two weeks, and the patterns are what you actually fix.
One complete paper a week under exam conditions: 100 minutes, no phone, no pausing. This is where the timing plan and the guessing decision become automatic rather than things you think about.
Mark with the real formula each time. Watching the negative marking eat your score is the most effective teacher there is.
Reread your list of mistakes. Redo the questions you got wrong. Confirm your registration, your documents and your exam centre. Sleep properly, the exam rewards a working brain more than an extra chapter.
Four mistakes
The single most common error. Two months is enough to review, not enough to learn. Candidates who start late rush content and never practise under time.
Grinding through hundreds of questions and only checking the letter feels productive and teaches almost nothing. The explanation is the lesson.
Untimed accuracy is a different skill from timed accuracy. Plenty of candidates who could score 60 in two hours score 35 in 100 minutes.
Filling in every blank because "there's a chance" is how people hand back six or seven points. With five options and negative marking, the maths does not support it.
500 of them, every answer explained, weighted to the real paper.
See the materials